|
PS28@squat.net Pretoriusstraat 28 squatted since feb2001 Social revolution at street level
|
|
[am*dam] building permit for PS28 granted! Hirsch Glik - 08.10.2006 22:25 Much to our dismay there has been a building permit just granted (on October 5th) for the squatter fortress Pretoriusstraat 28. An earlier building permit was withdrawn in January 2006 in connection with the dubious practices of the then owner Joe McCarthy. However, in an attempt to evade the reach of the law BIBOB, McCarthy has managed to secure himself a group of front-men. The civil servants from the building/housing service have, despite clear indications that these are indeed just front-men, acted as though they haven't heard anything about this. On Monday 9th October the squatting group is going to present members of the district council with this story and thus plans to confront the responsible politicians with their lack of effectiveness in this matter. Bring the story, demand action! Bring the story, demand action! The Pretoriusstraat 28 has a turbulent history of mafia-like house-owners and their gangs of heavies, renters that are thrown on the street and a squatting group that has firmly held its ground for almost 6 years. As a consequence of the efforts and the research of the Spekulatie Onderzoeks Kollektief (SPOK) the unsavoury activities of McCarthy have been successfully exposed to the light. This led not only to the closure of his illegal-labour businesses but also to an enormous claim from the tax service (that as a consequence laid claim to the property on the Pretoriusstraat) and the withdrawal of an already-issued building permit. At the beginning of 2006 the property should have ended up in the public auction so that the unusually high mortgage of 500,000(!) could be paid off. It was however bought privately before it could reach auction, by the bookkeeper of McCarthy and his friends (the gentlemen Koch, Segaar, Van de Laar and Klomp). The purchase price was moreover for around 150,000 euro more than the price that the auction property estate agent had estimated. The man who has for years used the Pretoriusstraat 28 as a money washing machine is of course not planning to simply let go of the property! The 'new' owners, a group of speculators from Haarlem, Alkmaar and Den Haag, filed (alongside 'ex-owner' McCarthy) a complaint against the withdrawal of the building permit. This complaint, however, collapsed at the complaints commission. Following a presentation of hard evidence by the squatting group, which demonstrated co-operation between the old and new owners, the complaints commission made clear what they thought of the case. They made clear that it would make the BIBOB law pointless if a simple front-man construction was sufficient to evade its reach. In addition, they indicated, the new owners should also be checked, precisely within the context of monitoring any connections with the old owner. The 'new owners' have subsequently submitted the same building permit request (as McCarthy), under their own name. The squatters have also on this occasion made it clear to the local district council what the facts of the situation are. The answer from the council and the cabinet of the council was just as clear as the answer from the complaints commission: it is not the intention to be led a merry dance by all kinds of vague financial transactions. But are these assurances backed-up by action? The viewpoint of the council and the complaints commission has, in this case, obviously not penetrated to the layers of the civil service that implement policy; these people have issued the building permit! The most difficult thing to swallow (in the justification for the granting of the permit) is the almost cheeky manner in which the arguments of the SPOK and the residents were rejected. In the decision of the civil service can be read, without any further explanation and in total contradiction with the facts, that "that it has not been made plausible that there exists any relationship between the present and former requesters of the building permit." However, in the good tradition of the squatting group of East Amsterdam, we hold the political leaders of the local council responsible for this. They are obviously so busy with thorny issue of the Polderweggebied that they have (in their own tradition) let irresponsible and maybe even corrupt types from the civil service simply do their own thing. For this reason the squatting group is planning, on Monday 9th October at the Commissie Wonen (housing) of the local council, to go and explain its views about all this. 19.00 gather at Joe's Garage, Pretoriusstraat 28 20.00 sitting of Commissie Wonen at the office of the local council at Linneausstraat 89. EVERYBODY COME! 'tis a poyk ten undser trot: mer sejnen do!' (yiddish partizan song) the building permit: https://squat.net/spok/origs/mccarthy/docs/stadsdeel/20060105bouwvergunningPS28/ the whole history of Pretoriusstraat 28, including documents etc. (in Dutch): https://squat.net/ps28 (in English): https://squat.net/ps28/english/